We 2002 By Bruninho
Brazilian footballer Bruno Fernandes de Souza is taken into custody in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, in 2010. (Getty)June 9, 2010. She reportedly went missing after being taken to Bruno’s second home near Belo Horizonte, a city in Brazil.One month later, of Bruno in connection with her disappearance and the investigation that surrounded it.In an interview with police, Bruno’s 17-year-old cousin, Jorge Rosa, admitted that he took part in the abduction of Samudio alongside his friend. He also told police that she wasn’t missing, instead she was dead. But he didn’t initially say how she died.Rosa eventually told investigators that he and Bruno’s friend, Luiz Henrique Romao, picked up Samudio and her child from a hotel in Rio de Janeiro, telling her that she was being taken to speak with Bruno about the paternity claims.
The four drove 220 miles to Bruno’s second home, and Samudio was held hostage for six days before being strangled to death.A short while after Rosa’s confession, kidnapping, forming a criminal gang, corrupting minors and hiding a body and he surrendered to police.Samudio, who was 25 at the time, had a four-month-old baby and was believed to be demanding child support from Bruno. Her child was found with Bruno’s wife after her disappearance,.with carrying out Bruno’s orders to murder Samudio, including his wife, an ex-lover and an ex-police officer.The trial in 2013 was a dramatic scene. Bruno cried as he told the court how Romao paid someone else to murder Samudio.
He said to the jury that he didn’t order her killing, but he “accepted” it.But the prosecutors in the case said that Bruno did indeed order her murder because she had threatened legal action against him if he didn’t pay child support. Bruno reportedly claimed that he was told about Samudio’s kidnapping after it had happened and that where her hired killer was waiting.Bruno was found guilty of the charges and sentenced to 22 years in prison. He served less than a third — seven years — of the sentence before his lawyers secured his release,. The reason he was granted early release was due to a petition for habeas corpus, a document that reports an unlawful detention or imprisonment before a court.
The petition was filed because Brazil’s slow courts failed to rule on his appeal for years.and led to a car surfaced March 10. Brazilian team signs goalkeeper Bruno Fernandes who had ex-girlfriend murdered and fed to dogs.— PerthNow (@perthnow)In his 2013 trial, was murdered, dismembered and fed to dogs.
Previously, he had said he was unaware what happened to her, claiming she was likely alive but out of the country.Others charged in the case claimed hired Marcos Santos, a former military police officer, to torture Samudio before strangling her with a tie and chopping up her body. Parts of her corpse were allegedly fed to Santos’ rottweilers and.Bruno said during the trial that he wasn’t there for Samudio’s murder, but Rosa told him what happened.There he held her hands and asked (Romao) to tie them in front of her, and put a tie around her neck. And (Romao) even kicked Eliza’s legs away. That’s what Jorge told me. And that they had chopped up her body, that they had thrown her body for the dogs to eat.Santos was allegedly paid about $10,000 USD to kill her.
Brazilian footballer Bruno Fernandes de Souza (in red) is taken under custody to the presidium of Belo Horizonte, Brazil, in 2010. (Getty)Bruno had refused to testify for much of the trial, denying the accusations and continuing to claim that he wasn’t sure where she was.During a hearing, Romao informed the judge that he and the goalkeeper were no longer going to cooperate with the court. He told judge Pasta Marco Jose Couto Mattos that the “goalkeeper ” as a result of the trial and imprisonment.But the Secretariat of Rio de Janeiro denied that Bruno had tried to commit suicide. Prior to a court hearing, Bruno fainted inside of a cell after he suffered from a drop in his blood-glucose level. Eliza Samudio showing the report she presented before the women’s police station against footballer Bruno Fernandes de Souza. (Getty)Samudio was a Brazilian model, a student and a big soccer fan.She in 2009 at a party at a teammates’ home after a game. Bruno was married and had kids, but the two connected at the party and had an ongoing affair that lasted roughly three months.
The party was reportedly a “footballers orgy” in May 2009,. According to the article, the pair had sex, and Samudio was pregnant after Bruno’s condom burst.Bruno then reportedly “demanded” that Samudio have an abortion, but she moved forward with the pregnancy despite his wishes. When she was about four months pregnant, Samudio allegedly had informed police that she was held captive by Bruno and others and was forced to take, an illegal abortion drug. During the incident, Samudio claimed that Bruno placed a gun to her head and said, “You don’t know who I am or what I’m capable of.
I’m from the favela.”The Cyotec dose eventually failed, and Samudio ended up giving birth to the baby, named Bruninho, in February 2010. Bruno never acknowledged he was the father of the child and denied attempts to take a paternity test. Eventually, DNA tests proved that Bruninho was indeed the child of Bruno.Samudio previously had claimed to have an affair with soccer star Cristiano Ronaldo.
However, an analysis of the records show this picture is not as black and white as it seems. Official data and historical research had proven that what many Latin American students learn in school can be misleading.
The United States did offer political support to some Latin American dictators in order deter the threat of communism. But the military assistance was much weaker and inconsistent than what is commonly understood in a South American classroom. Many of the wealthiest and most populous nations of the region stopped receiving money from United States at some point of their military regimes - mainly due to human rights related issues. During the Cold War period, many Latin American countries had military regimes. Among the 20 countries considered part of this region, only Costa Rica and Mexico did not.
Amid the other 18 countries, all of them, except Venezuela, received military help from United States during the years of military regime (see info graphic). The main explanation for this support is that Latin American army forces had a conservative approach, and would act to prevent communists from reaching power – as it had happened in Cuba in 1959. According to Elio Gaspari, a Brazilian writer specialized in the dictatorship era, the United States showed more interest in supporting military regimes in countries like Brazil and Argentina - which were among the wealthier and more populous nations in the continent, Chile - which was under a socialist government, and Nicaragua - which was dealing with the rise of Sandinism, a movement with leftist political tendencies. These dictatorships can be considered the most typical cases of US political support - but they all hold different aspects.
“In Brazil, the military regime took over a government that supposedly could be socialist; in Chile, there was no doubt, the government was socialist; and Argentina was a chaos”, explains Mr. During the next 22 years, the biggest Latin American nation - with a population of more than 70 million people at that time - would go through some years of strong military repression against leftist movements and freedom of expression. The period between 1968 and 1974, known as “Anos de Chumbo” (Plumb Years) was the most repressive time in Brazilian recent history - most of the political arrests, tortures and censorships happened during this period. Officially, the Brazilian government admits to the death of 357 people due to political reasons during dictatorship.
However, a survey developed by the families of these victims points to 426 deaths. The historical consensus is that United States praised these changes in Latin American countries. Ruled by conservative militaries, chances were they would not take the communist path and the threat would not enter the United States’. Speaking to Hal Brands, author of Latin America’s Cold War he said that “prior to the late 1970s, the US had a lot of incentive in supporting the militaries of these Latin American countries.
Communism was the biggest threat at the time and they wanted as many allies as possible to keep it at bay”. The data, however, implies this support was strong, but not very long lasting. All the $1,611 billion Brazil received in military assistance Brazil received during those 22 years was concentrated in the first 13 years. After that, military help was cut due to United States human rights policy. Among the 10 years in which Brazil received more military aid, five were during the military dictatorship (the other five were during the 50s and the 60s).
In 1964, the year of the takeover, the country was granted more than $202 million - it was the fifth biggest grant. During the first of the most repressive years - 1968 - the country received $ 190 million, and, two years before the cut, 1975, the amount was $227 million. In Chile this pattern is even more clear. The three years in which the country received more money was in the beginning of the 60s, and, following that, were the first two years of military dictatorship: 1973 and 1974 (around 62 million each). In 1975, Chile received only $2.2 million, and nothing was granted between 1976 and 1990. In Argentina, something similar happened: 1976 was the year in which they received the third largest amount- $112 million. In 1977, though, it was around $ 2 million and then ceased until 1987.
These cuts have a strong relationship with the political situation in United States. In 1977, Jimmy Carter entered into office. It was a very delicate time for America. They had recently pulled out of brutal and overwhelmingly disapproved of war.
The government had betrayed the trust of its citizens during the Watergate scandal. The American people were tired and disillusioned. Carter knew he must do something to restore its moral image. So at the United Nations General Assembly in March 1977, Carter announced that the protection and promotion of human rights would be at the forefront of its foreign policy. The policy was wrapped up in moral terms, but it had other purposes as well. First, the policy was also meant to repair damage done to the image of the US during the Vietnam War. Second, also the US wanted to create an image that stood in stark contrast to the Soviet Union.
And third, it was a matter of national security. Right wing dictatorships were bad security risks. The US knew that these dictatorships would eventually fail, and they did not want their populaces remembering that the US had sided with their oppressors. The area were this policy had the greatest application was in Latin America. In 1977 security assistance was cut off to Chile and Uruguay, however, without any formal declarations of their human rights abuses.
Brands pointed out, there was still some economic assistance flowing in most cases. To completely cut off a nation from assistance for human rights violations was a double edged sword. Brands noted that the idea was just to cut direct military support.
The US was uncomfortable cutting all support because if you withdraw economic aid to countries violating human rights, you would be contributing to the suffering of people already under oppression. According to Mr. Gaspari, the cuts in military aid were not that important to Latin American dictators. “The political and diplomatic support was more relevant than the military”, he says. He explains that the maintenance of good diplomatic relationship with United States and even some intelligence support were more helpful to maintain these governments legitimated than financing the armies. Gaspari even says there is an anecdotal aspect to this military assistance. “United States used to sell old tanks and obsolete weapons to Latin American countries, for example, they did not to spend money and good machinery here, once they had other wars to fight in the East, were the real enemy was”, he explains.
We 2002 By Bruninho Sea
He says the amounts distributed during the first years of these dictatorships were more a way to show support and strengthen the bonds with nations they hoped to not lose to the leftist side of the force. I am not going to play the highbrow intellectual and say that my favorite writer is Marcel Proust or something. It is probably Agatha Christie.But lately it is, the author of the, who got a special place in my heart and mind.
Besides the great characters (like the unforgettable paranoid android ) and the delightful way of writing, I like his amusement about the Universe. With his childish way of constructing metaphors and weird sentences, he managed to be deeply philosophical.As he says:'The world is a thing of utter inordinate complexity and richness and strangeness that is absolutely awesome.
I mean the idea that such complexity can arise not only out of such simplicity, but probably absolutely out of nothing, is the most fabulous extraordinary idea. And once you get some kind of inkling of how that might have happened, it's just wonderful. And the opportunity to spend 70 or 80 years of your life in such a universe is time well spent as far as I am concerned.'
The Globe of Science and Innovation, CERN.I could not agree more with that. The Universe is intriguing. I was always fascinated about this fundamental questions. How did we simply surged from nothing, notime, nowhere?
How, from a small probability in a particle soup had the Universe materialized and evolved to everything we have today?An older and much smaller brother of the LHCBeing like that, my main goal in, Switzerland, was to visit, the studies center where the is located. Like a kid, I spent hours in the exhibitions, amused about everything, even about those that I already knew. From antiparticles to multiple dimensions, everything there was just incredible.Exhibition in the Globe of Science and InnovationFor those as obsessed about the Universe as I am, or even for those that are just curious, a visit to the CERN is totally recommended.
Scheduling with antecedence, you can join a guided tour, presented by physicists that work there (in English or French). The visit and the exhibitions are for free, and are open from Monday to Sunday. To get there is easy: just take the train 18 in the center of Geneva.
Anyone who access the in Brazil right now will be flooded with information about. The one who decides to crawl over the news will probably have a hard time understanding what happened, due to the high amount of bizarre details. It is like an extreme version of story. Surrealistic and sad at the same time. Violence against women, child kidnapping, animal abuse, everything was there.In order for non-Brazilians to understand this peculiar case, I've prepared a summary:- Imagine a big soccer team, with millions of fans. Imagine this team won the national championship. Imagine its players are heroes.
This big team is. In 2009 they won Brazilian championship - the. Assignment for Community Management Course, from my in.Daniel asked us to write about this:Are Social Networks and new tech devices promoting isolation or community?Asked about it some months ago I would answer with a huge COMMUNITY and say that those people who say the opposite are just apocalyptical creatures that got stuck in the 20th century.Now I will temporize.
I still believe that social network improves our sense of community, makes us closer to people that are far away from us. I'm living in Spain and I can have hang outs with my beloved friends from Brazil. It also allow us to meet people we would never come across in 'real' life. The networking process is so much easier right now!But I admit it. I spend a lot of time in social networks, time that I could be using to chat face to face with people. My best friend, used to share an apartment with me.
We sometimes would be talking through gtalk to each other. Each one in a room.And I really think that they might prevent me from doing what a real journalist should do. Go there and meet the source face to face. Sometimes I just speak to them through this networks and I can't see their expressions, if they are comfortable or not - it is a part of journalistic interview to look in the person's eyes.
Facebook and Twitter are great ways to find someone to talk about something. Do you need someone in India who uses pink scarfs as a flag in the rear window of his car? You will be able to find it. But also, this virtual communication through web won't make you get to know this person better.I still thinking internet and new gadgets make us closer, but yes, it can tear us apart. Joy Divison, for those who did not get the reference or for those who got it and now have this music as a.
We 2002 By Bruninho Value
Assignmentfor CommunityManagement Course, from my in.SometimesI feel that I'm back in 2004, when I started my graduation course inJournalism in.By that time, between campus parties, bad wine hangovers and allkinds of leftist indoctrination during classes, we usually hadapocalyptic dicussions about how journalism was changing because ofthe.Nineyears later, the discussion goes on.
Straightforward EditingCorel has done a nice job of stepping the VideoStudio Pro X7 video editor up to full 64-bit support, and reworking the interface to improve the editing experience. The FastFlick tool can help new users quickly turn out impressive-looking projects, and provides a fast-start to build an animated project for further customization.The VideoStudio Pro X7 interface is straightforward, with everything at hand for basic editing. Corel videostudio x7.